Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs FX-7500

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7500
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
2.02
+1163%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.16

FX-7500 outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a whopping 1163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19273294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriPentium 4-M
Power efficiency10.060.50
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L2 cache4096 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm130 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Number of transistors2,410 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-7500 2.02
+1163%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 0.16

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

FX-7500 2771
+347%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 620

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

FX-7500 23.32
+959%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 247

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 0.16
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 30 Watt

FX-7500 has a 1162.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

The FX-7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7500 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 91 vote

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7500 or Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.