Core 2 Duo T7300 vs FX-7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1810not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$234
Current price$267 $39 (0.2x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache4096 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size245 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA1no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-7500 3209
+375%
Core 2 Duo T7300 676

FX-7500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7300 by 375% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-7500 310
+42.2%
Core 2 Duo T7300 218

FX-7500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7300 by 42% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-7500 689
+89.8%
Core 2 Duo T7300 363

FX-7500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7300 by 90% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

FX-7500 2060
+1%
Core 2 Duo T7300 2040

FX-7500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7300 by 1% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-7500 5482
+46.9%
Core 2 Duo T7300 3733

FX-7500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7300 by 47% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-7500 2771
+60.2%
Core 2 Duo T7300 1729

FX-7500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7300 by 60% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2014 9 May 2007
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7500 and Core 2 Duo T7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Core 2 Duo T7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 81 vote

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 115 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7500 or Core 2 Duo T7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.