EPYC 7313 vs FX-7500

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7500
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
2.10
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.54
+1116%

EPYC 7313 outperforms FX-7500 by a whopping 1116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-7500 and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1908200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.31
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.0815.03
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cache4096 KB8 MB
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die size245 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors2,410 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and EPYC 7313 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 7313 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-7500 2.10
EPYC 7313 25.54
+1116%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-7500 3209
EPYC 7313 39091
+1118%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-7500 315
EPYC 7313 1487
+372%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-7500 684
EPYC 7313 11432
+1571%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.10 25.54
Recency 4 June 2014 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 155 Watt

FX-7500 has 715.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 1116.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-7500 in performance tests.

Be aware that FX-7500 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7500 and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 89 votes

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7500 or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.