Athlon 800 vs FX-7500

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-7500 and Athlon 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1908not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Kaverino data
Power efficiency10.08no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Thunderbird (1999−2000)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)20 December 1999 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and Athlon 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz0.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm180 nm
Die size245 mm2102 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors2,410 million22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and Athlon 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP3A
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt43 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and Athlon 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and Athlon 800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and Athlon 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR1
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and Athlon 800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and Athlon 800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and Athlon 800.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2014 20 December 1999
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 43 Watt

FX-7500 has an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 126.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-7500 and Athlon 800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FX-7500 is a notebook processor while Athlon 800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7500 and Athlon 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
AMD Athlon 800
Athlon 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 89 votes

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7500 or Athlon 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.