Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs FX-7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7500
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
2.07

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms FX-7500 by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1814803
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriApple M-Series
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)no data
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)18 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$267 no data

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 cache4096 KB28 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Number of transistors2410 Million33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP3no data
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsApple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-7500 2.07
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 8.89
+329%

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms FX-7500 by 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-7500 153
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 1320
+763%

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms FX-7500 by 763% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-7500 55
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 210
+282%

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms FX-7500 by 282% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 8.89
Recency 4 June 2014 18 October 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

The Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-7500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7500 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
M1 Pro 8-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 81 vote

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 95 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro 8-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7500 or Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.