A4-5000 vs FX-7500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7500
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
2.07
+146%

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-7500 and A4-5000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18142480
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price$267 $248

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and A4-5000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.5 GHz
L2 cache4096 KB2048 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and A4-5000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3FT3
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and A4-5000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1600
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
FRTC1no data
PowerTune--
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect++
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and A4-5000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and A4-5000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 8330
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and A4-5000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and A4-5000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and A4-5000.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-7500 2.07
+146%
A4-5000 0.84

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-7500 3209
+148%
A4-5000 1295

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 148% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-7500 313
+95.6%
A4-5000 160

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 96% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-7500 695
+44.8%
A4-5000 480

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 45% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

FX-7500 2060
+70.7%
A4-5000 1207

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 71% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-7500 5482
+31.6%
A4-5000 4165

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 32% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-7500 2771
+35.9%
A4-5000 2039

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 36% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

FX-7500 23.32
+63.8%
A4-5000 38.2

A4-5000 outperforms FX-7500 by 64% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FX-7500 2
+16.2%
A4-5000 1

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 16% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-7500 153
+28.6%
A4-5000 119

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 29% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-7500 55
+66.7%
A4-5000 33

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 67% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FX-7500 0.65
+66.7%
A4-5000 0.39

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 67% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-7500 1.1
+19.6%
A4-5000 0.9

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 20% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-7500 1479
+37.2%
A4-5000 1078

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 37% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-7500 14
+59.4%
A4-5000 9

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 59% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

FX-7500 69
+65.8%
A4-5000 41

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 66% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

FX-7500 4116
+49%
A4-5000 2762

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 49% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

FX-7500 1769
+103%
A4-5000 870

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 103% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

FX-7500 4730
+55.6%
A4-5000 3041

FX-7500 outperforms A4-5000 by 56% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 0.84
Recency 4 June 2014 23 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 15 Watt

The FX-7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-5000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7500 and A4-5000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
AMD A4-5000
A4-5000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 81 vote

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 342 votes

Rate A4-5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7500 or A4-5000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.