Xeon E5-4660 v4 vs FX-6350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.94
Xeon E5-4660 v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
9.94
+238%

Xeon E5-4660 v4 outperforms FX-6350 by a whopping 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and Xeon E5-4660 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1576721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.803.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E5
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,727
Current price$128 $880 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-4660 v4 has 283% better value for money than FX-6350.

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and Xeon E5-4660 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads632
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3 GHz
Bus supportno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
L2 cache6144 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data40 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C83 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and Xeon E5-4660 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketAM3+FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Xeon E5-4660 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
PAEno data46 Bit
Instruction Replayno data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

FX-6350 and Xeon E5-4660 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Xeon E5-4660 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Xeon E5-4660 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Xeon E5-4660 v4.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6350 2.94
Xeon E5-4660 v4 9.94
+238%

Xeon E5-4660 v4 outperforms FX-6350 by 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6350 4546
Xeon E5-4660 v4 15375
+238%

Xeon E5-4660 v4 outperforms FX-6350 by 238% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.94 9.94
Recency 29 April 2013 20 June 2016
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 6 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 120 Watt

The Xeon E5-4660 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6350 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-4660 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and Xeon E5-4660 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
Intel Xeon E5-4660 v4
Xeon E5-4660 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 348 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4660 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or Xeon E5-4660 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.