Opteron 1352 (B2) vs FX-6350
Primary details
Comparing FX-6350 and Opteron 1352 (B2) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1632 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Workstation |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Budapest (2008) |
| Release date | 29 April 2013 (11 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-6350 and Opteron 1352 (B2) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 285 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 463 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-6350 and Opteron 1352 (B2) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Opteron 1352 (B2). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Opteron 1352 (B2) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Opteron 1352 (B2). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Opteron 1352 (B2).
| PCIe version | n/a | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 April 2013 | 3 June 2008 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 95 Watt |
FX-6350 has an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron 1352 (B2), on the other hand, has 31.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-6350 and Opteron 1352 (B2). We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-6350 is a desktop processor while Opteron 1352 (B2) is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and Opteron 1352 (B2), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
