A6-7480 vs FX-6350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.94
+147%

FX-6350 outperforms A6-7480 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and A6-7480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15762262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.80no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)26 October 2018 (5 years ago)
Current price$128 $29

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and A6-7480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data160K
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and A6-7480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and A6-7480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and A6-7480 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and A6-7480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Radeon R5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and A6-7480.

PCIe versionn/a3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6350 2.94
+147%
A6-7480 1.19

FX-6350 outperforms A6-7480 by 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6350 4546
+148%
A6-7480 1836

FX-6350 outperforms A6-7480 by 148% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.94 1.19
Recency 29 April 2013 26 October 2018
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

The FX-6350 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7480 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and A6-7480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
AMD A6-7480
A6-7480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 348 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 145 votes

Rate A6-7480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or A6-7480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.