Core i5 vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.67
+23%

FX-6300 outperforms Core i5 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Core i5 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16241772
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.326.78
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)1 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$67 $194

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core i5 has 414% better value for money than FX-6300.

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Core i5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)no data
Threads6no data
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHzno data
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6144 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Core i5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Core i5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Core i5 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Core i5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Core i5.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.67
+23%
Core i5 2.17

FX-6300 outperforms Core i5 by 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6300 4137
+59.2%
Core i5 2598

FX-6300 outperforms Core i5 by 59% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

FX-6300 4900
Core i5 6640
+35.5%

Core i5 outperforms FX-6300 by 36% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.67 2.17
Recency 23 October 2012 1 October 2023

The FX-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Core i5, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Intel Core i5
Core i5

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3788 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 34 votes

Rate Core i5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Core i5, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.