Core Duo U2400 vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1628not rated
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.32no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCore Duo
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)no data
Current price$64 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus supportno data533 MHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6144 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KB2 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data0.8-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6300 4137
+1522%
Duo U2400 255

FX-6300 outperforms Core Duo U2400 by 1522% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 9 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6300 is a desktop processor while Core Duo U2400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Core Duo U2400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Intel Core Duo U2400
Core Duo U2400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3824 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Core Duo U2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Core Duo U2400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.