Celeron G440 vs FX-6300

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Celeron G440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1713not rated
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.59no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132$45

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Celeron G440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads61
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache288 KB64 KB
L2 cache6144 KB256 KB
L3 cache8192 KB1 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C66 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Celeron G440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Celeron G440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

FX-6300 and Celeron G440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Celeron G440 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Celeron G440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-6300 and Celeron G440 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Celeron G440.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
+885%
Celeron G440 420

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 4 September 2011
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 1
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-6300 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron G440, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6300 and Celeron G440. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Celeron G440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Intel Celeron G440
Celeron G440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4080 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 52 votes

Rate Celeron G440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Celeron G440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.