Processor U300 vs FX-6200

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6200 and Processor U300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1728not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency1.95no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads66
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data55 MHz
L1 cache288 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

FX-6200 and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Processor U300.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 February 2012 4 January 2023
Physical cores 6 5
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

FX-6200 has 20% more physical cores.

Processor U300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6200 and Processor U300. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6200 is a desktop processor while Processor U300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and Processor U300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
Intel Processor U300
Processor U300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 134 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 12 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6200 or Processor U300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.