PRO A10-8770 vs FX-6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6200
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.67
+14.1%

FX-6200 outperforms PRO A10-8770 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17231815
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.953.28
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6144 KB2048 KB
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Switchable graphics-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-n/a

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770.

PCIe versionn/a3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 2.67
+14.1%
PRO A10-8770 2.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6200 4085
+14.3%
PRO A10-8770 3574

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.67 2.34
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

FX-6200 has a 14.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

PRO A10-8770, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-6200 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A10-8770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and PRO A10-8770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
AMD PRO A10-8770
PRO A10-8770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 133 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 115 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6200 or PRO A10-8770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.