Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs FX-6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6200 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1636not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.51no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMobile Athlon 64
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Oakville (2003−2004)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)August 2004 (19 years ago)
Current price$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads61
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache288 KB128K
L2 cache6144 KB512K
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size315 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+754
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6200 4105
+833%
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ 440

FX-6200 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ by 833% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 1
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-6200 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6200 is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 126 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6200 or Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.