Celeron M 373 vs FX-6200

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6200 and Celeron M 373 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1728not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency1.95no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and Celeron M 373 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads61
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6144 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Celeron M 373 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Celeron M 373. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Celeron M 373 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Celeron M 373. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Celeron M 373.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 5 Watt

FX-6200 has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 373, on the other hand, has 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6200 and Celeron M 373. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6200 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 373 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and Celeron M 373, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
Intel Celeron M 373
Celeron M 373

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 134 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Celeron M 373 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6200 or Celeron M 373, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.