Xeon w9-3495X vs FX-6130

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-6130
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.81
Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
58.32
+1975%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms FX-6130 by a whopping 1975% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6130 and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking158416
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Sapphire Rapids
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6130 and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads6112
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache288 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on FX-6130 and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6130 and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

FX-6130 and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6130 and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6130 and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6130 and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6130 2.81
Xeon w9-3495X 58.32
+1975%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms FX-6130 by 1975% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6130 4353
Xeon w9-3495X 90210
+1972%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms FX-6130 by 1972% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.81 58.32
Recency 23 October 2012 1 January 2023
Physical cores 6 56
Threads 6 112
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 350 Watt

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6130 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6130 is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6130 and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6130
FX-6130
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12 votes

Rate FX-6130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 174 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6130 or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.