PRO A10-8750B vs FX-6130

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6130
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.83
+48.2%

FX-6130 outperforms PRO A10-8750B by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16881985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.731.84
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Godaveri (2014−2016)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)29 September 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6 MB4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Number of pipelinesno data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6130 2.83
+48.2%
PRO A10-8750B 1.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6130 4353
+48.3%
PRO A10-8750B 2935

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.83 1.91
Recency 23 October 2012 29 September 2015
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

FX-6130 has a 48.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

PRO A10-8750B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-6130 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A10-8750B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6130 and PRO A10-8750B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6130
FX-6130
AMD PRO A10-8750B
PRO A10-8750B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate FX-6130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 57 votes

Rate PRO A10-8750B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6130 or PRO A10-8750B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.