Xeon Silver 4316 vs FX-6120

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6120
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.51
Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
20.26
+707%

Xeon Silver 4316 outperforms FX-6120 by a whopping 707% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6120 and Xeon Silver 4316 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1664252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4130.83
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$54 $1080

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4316 has 2087% better value for money than FX-6120.

Detailed specifications

FX-6120 and Xeon Silver 4316 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads640
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache288 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-6120 and Xeon Silver 4316 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6120 and Xeon Silver 4316. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

FX-6120 and Xeon Silver 4316 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6120 and Xeon Silver 4316 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6120 and Xeon Silver 4316. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2667
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6120 and Xeon Silver 4316.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6120 2.51
Xeon Silver 4316 20.26
+707%

Xeon Silver 4316 outperforms FX-6120 by 707% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6120 3887
Xeon Silver 4316 31341
+706%

Xeon Silver 4316 outperforms FX-6120 by 706% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.51 20.26
Recency 23 October 2012 6 April 2021
Physical cores 6 20
Threads 6 40
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 150 Watt

The Xeon Silver 4316 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6120 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6120 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4316 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6120 and Xeon Silver 4316, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6120
FX-6120
Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 33 votes

Rate FX-6120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6120 or Xeon Silver 4316, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.