Ryzen 3 5300G vs FX-6120

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6120
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.54
Ryzen 3 5300G
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.43
+232%

Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms FX-6120 by a whopping 232% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6120 and Ryzen 3 5300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1750921
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency2.4411.83
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6120 and Ryzen 3 5300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data40
L1 cache288 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on FX-6120 and Ryzen 3 5300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6120 and Ryzen 3 5300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6120 and Ryzen 3 5300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6120 and Ryzen 3 5300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6120 and Ryzen 3 5300G.

PCIe version2.04.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6120 2.54
Ryzen 3 5300G 8.43
+232%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6120 3887
Ryzen 3 5300G 12902
+232%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-6120 517
Ryzen 3 5300G 1767
+242%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-6120 1890
Ryzen 3 5300G 5478
+190%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.54 8.43
Recency 23 October 2012 13 April 2021
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

FX-6120 has 50% more physical cores.

Ryzen 3 5300G, on the other hand, has a 231.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 33.3% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 5300G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6120 and Ryzen 3 5300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6120
FX-6120
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
Ryzen 3 5300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 34 votes

Rate FX-6120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 105 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6120 or Ryzen 3 5300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.