Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs FX-6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6100
2011
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.38
+45.1%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.64

FX-6100 outperforms Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17011988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.991.93
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)November 2009 (14 years ago)
Current price$39 $88

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-6100 has 55% better value for money than Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache288 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2258 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6100 2.38
+45.1%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 1.64

FX-6100 outperforms Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) by 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6100 3682
+44.7%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 2544

FX-6100 outperforms Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) by 45% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.38 1.64
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

The FX-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1016 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 597 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.