Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs FX-6200

Primary details

Comparing FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1636	1988
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.63	1.93
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date	27 February 2012 (12 years ago)	November 2009 (14 years ago)
Current price	$38	$88

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) has 206% better value for money than FX-6200.

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	6	4
Base clock speed	3.8 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	4.1 GHz	3.4 GHz
L1 cache	288 KB	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	6144 KB	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	8192 KB	6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	315 mm2	258 mm2
Maximum core temperature	61 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	758 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes
P0 Vcore voltage	Min: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V	no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	AM3
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

PCIe version

n/a

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 outperforms Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) by 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.65	1.64
Physical cores	6	4
Threads	6	4
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---