AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX-8320E

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

FX-8320E
3.23

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms FX-8320E by 44% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing FX-8320E and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14781184
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Value for money1.199.80
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date2 September 2014 (9 years old)7 July 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99
Current price$111 $215 (2.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3200G has 724% better value for money than FX-8320E.

Technical specs

FX-8320E and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen 3 3200G.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320E 3.23
Ryzen 3 3200G 4.65
+44%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms FX-8320E by 44% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8320E 4960
Ryzen 3 3200G 7139
+43.9%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms FX-8320E by 44% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8320E 445
Ryzen 3 3200G 1053
+137%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms FX-8320E by 137% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8320E 1684
Ryzen 3 3200G 3016
+79.1%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms FX-8320E by 79% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.23 4.65
Recency 2 September 2014 7 July 2019
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 994 votes

Rate AMD FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2724 votes

Rate AMD Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Ryzen 3 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.