Celeron 1020E vs FX-6100

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and Celeron 1020E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1701	2438
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.99	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron
Architecture codename	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date	12 October 2011 (12 years ago)	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price	$39	$27

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Celeron 1020E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	6	2
Base clock speed	3.3 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.9 GHz	2.2 GHz
L1 cache	288 KB	64K (per core)
L2 cache	6 MB	256K (per core)
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Die size	315 mm2	118 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	105 °C
Number of transistors	1,200 million	1,400 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Celeron 1020E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 1020E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+

Security technologies

FX-6100 and Celeron 1020E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 1020E are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 1020E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Celeron 1020E.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6100 outperforms Celeron 1020E by 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.38	0.91
Recency	12 October 2011	20 January 2013
Physical cores	6	2
Threads	6	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Celeron 1020E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---