Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX-4320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4320
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.01
Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.61
+129%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms FX-4320 by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4320 and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18351230
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.0012.79
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99
Current price$53 $150 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3200G has 220% better value for money than FX-4320.

Detailed specifications

FX-4320 and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache192 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4096 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4,940 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on FX-4320 and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and Ryzen 3 3200G.

PCIe versionNot Listed3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4320 2.01
Ryzen 3 3200G 4.61
+129%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms FX-4320 by 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4320 3114
Ryzen 3 3200G 7134
+129%

Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms FX-4320 by 129% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 4.61
Recency 23 October 2012 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4320
FX-4320
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 131 vote

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2882 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4320 or Ryzen 3 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.