A6-5400K vs FX-4320

Primary details

Comparing FX-4320 and A6-5400K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1838	2494
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.00	0.02
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Vishera (2012−2015)	Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date	23 October 2012 (11 years ago)	2 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price	$53	$163

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4320 has 19900% better value for money than A6-5400K.

Detailed specifications

FX-4320 and A6-5400K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	4 GHz	3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.1 GHz	3.8 GHz
L1 cache	192 KB	128 KB (per core)
L2 cache	4096 KB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	4096 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	315 mm2	246 mm2
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	70 °C
Number of transistors	1,200 million	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on FX-4320 and A6-5400K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	FM2
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and A6-5400K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
FMA	+	no data
AVX	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and A6-5400K are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and A6-5400K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3-1866

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Radeon HD 7540D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and A6-5400K.

PCIe version

Not Listed

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4320 outperforms A6-5400K by 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.01	0.82
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and A6-5400K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---