Celeron P1053 vs FX-4300
Primary details
Comparing FX-4300 and Celeron P1053 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1968 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.87 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Jasper Forest (2010) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 12 February 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $122 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
FX-4300 and Celeron P1053 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4300 and Celeron P1053 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | 1366 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Celeron P1053. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Celeron P1053 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Celeron P1053. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Celeron P1053.
| PCIe version | n/a | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 12 February 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 30 Watt |
FX-4300 has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron P1053, on the other hand, has 216.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-4300 and Celeron P1053. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-4300 is a desktop processor while Celeron P1053 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Celeron P1053, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
