Atom 230 vs FX-4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4300 and Atom 230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1875not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.58no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)1 March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29
Current price$40 $170 (5.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4300 and Atom 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus supportno data533 MHz
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C85 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million47 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on FX-4300 and Atom 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Atom 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

FX-4300 and Atom 230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Atom 230 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Atom 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Atom 230.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4300 2987
+1667%
Atom 230 169

FX-4300 outperforms Atom 230 by 1667% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 1 March 2008
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 4 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-4300 and Atom 230. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4300 is a desktop processor while Atom 230 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Atom 230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4300
FX-4300
Intel Atom 230
Atom 230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1632 votes

Rate FX-4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 51 vote

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4300 or Atom 230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.