Atom C3508 vs FX-4120

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4120 and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4120 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache192 KB224 KB
L2 cache4 MB8 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-4120 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4120 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

FX-4120 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4120 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4120 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4120 and Atom C3508.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 15 August 2017
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 11 Watt

Atom C3508 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 763.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-4120 and Atom C3508. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4120 is a desktop processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4120 and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4120
FX-4120
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate FX-4120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4120 or Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.