Duron 1300 vs FX-4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Duron 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2063not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Duron
Power efficiency1.64no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)21 January 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Duron 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data13
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KB64 KB
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm180 nm
Die size315 mm2105.68 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million25 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Duron 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Duron 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Duron 1300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Duron 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Duron 1300.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 21 January 2002
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 60 Watt

FX-4100 has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

Duron 1300, on the other hand, has 58.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-4100 and Duron 1300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Duron 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
AMD Duron 1300
Duron 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 864 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Duron 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Duron 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.