Xeon Phi 7210 vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
65.79
+1276%

EPYC 9754 outperforms Xeon Phi 7210 by a whopping 1276% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking111271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.07no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency16.632.02
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Knights Landing (2016)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12864 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads256256
Base clock speed2.25 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)32 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2no data
Number of transistors71,000 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP53647
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt215 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7210.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 65.79
+1276%
Xeon Phi 7210 4.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+1275%
Xeon Phi 7210 7306

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.79 4.78
Recency 13 June 2023 20 June 2016
Physical cores 128 64
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 215 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 1276.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Phi 7210, on the other hand, has 67.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Phi 7210 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and Xeon Phi 7210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
Intel Xeon Phi 7210
Xeon Phi 7210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 36 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or Xeon Phi 7210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.