Xeon Gold 5416S vs EPYC 9654

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5416S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	4	189
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.12	33.37
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	AMD EPYC	no data
Architecture codename	Genoa	Sapphire Rapids
Release date	10 November 2022 (1 year ago)	10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$11,805	no data
Current price	$4544 (0.4x MSRP)	$1244

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5416S has 230% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5416S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	96	16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads	192	32
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.7 GHz	4 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	80K (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	384 MB (shared)	30 MB
Chip lithography	5 nm, 6 nm	Intel 7 nm
Die size	12x 72 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	79 °C
Number of transistors	78,840 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5416S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	2
Socket	SP5	FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)	360 Watt	150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5416S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+
TSX	no data	+
Status	no data	Launched

Security technologies

EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5416S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+
SGX	no data	Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5416S are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5416S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size	6 TiB	4 TB
Max memory channels	no data	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	460.8 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	no data	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5416S.

PCIe version	5.0	5
PCI Express lanes	128	80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon Gold 5416S by 236% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	78.98	23.53
Recency	10 November 2022	10 January 2023
Physical cores	96	16
Threads	192	32
Power consumption (TDP)	360 Watt	150 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654 and Xeon Gold 5416S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---