Xeon 6325P vs EPYC 8324PN

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8324PN
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 130 Watt
5.21
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96
+91.2%

Xeon 6325P outperforms EPYC 8324PN by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1311878
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4876.54
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.8717.47
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,125$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6325P has 5072% better value for money than EPYC 8324PN.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8324PN and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.05 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm10 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2163 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °Cno data
Number of transistors35,500 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8324PN and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP61700
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324PN and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 8324PN and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8324PN and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8324PN and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8324PN and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes9616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8324PN 5.21
Xeon 6325P 9.96
+91.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8324PN 8375
Xeon 6325P 16013
+91.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.21 9.96
Recency 18 September 2023 24 February 2025
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 55 Watt

EPYC 8324PN has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has a 91.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 136.4% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon 6325P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 8324PN in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8324PN
EPYC 8324PN
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8324PN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8324PN and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.