Xeon 6325P vs EPYC 8224P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8224P
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 160 Watt
28.10
+182%
Xeon 6325P
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 55 Watt
9.96

EPYC 8224P outperforms Xeon 6325P by a whopping 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking211890
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.0476.54
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.797.00
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$855$281

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6325P has 155% better value for money than EPYC 8224P.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8224P and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Threads488
Base clock speed2.55 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size2x 73 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors17,750 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8224P and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8224P and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 8224P and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8224P and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8224P and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8224P and Xeon 6325P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes9620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 8224P 28.10
+182%
Xeon 6325P 9.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 8224P 45180
+182%
Xeon 6325P 16013

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.10 9.96
Recency 18 September 2023 24 February 2025
Physical cores 24 4
Threads 48 8
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 55 Watt

EPYC 8224P has a 182.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 190.9% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 8224P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6325P in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8224P
EPYC 8224P
Intel Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8224P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6325P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8224P and Xeon 6325P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.