Atom x7213RE vs EPYC 8324PN
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 8324PN and Atom x7213RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (1 year ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,125 | $42 |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8324PN and Atom x7213RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 64 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.05 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 4x 73 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 85 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 35,500 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8324PN and Atom x7213RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP6 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324PN and Atom x7213RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8324PN and Atom x7213RE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8324PN and Atom x7213RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8324PN and Atom x7213RE.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 8 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 2 |
| Threads | 64 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 9 Watt |
EPYC 8324PN has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Atom x7213RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 1344.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 8324PN and Atom x7213RE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 8324PN is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7213RE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8324PN and Atom x7213RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
