Xeon 6780E vs EPYC 8024PN

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)3 June 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$525$11,350

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)144
Threads16144
Base clock speed2.05 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4 MB (per module)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)108 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)85 °C85 °C
Number of transistors8,875 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP64710
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes9688

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2023 3 June 2024
Physical cores 8 144
Threads 16 144
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 330 Watt

EPYC 8024PN has 312.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 1700% more physical cores and 800% more threads.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8024PN and Xeon 6780E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8024PN
EPYC 8024PN
Intel Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8024PN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon 6780E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 8024PN or Xeon 6780E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.