Ryzen Embedded V2718 vs EPYC 7H12
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen Embedded V2718 by a whopping 340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 94 | 1011 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 6.00 | 38.19 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 18 September 2019 (6 years ago) | 10 November 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Embedded V2718 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 26 | 17 |
| L1 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 32 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Embedded V2718 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Embedded V2718. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Embedded V2718 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Embedded V2718. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 8 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | 68.269 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Embedded V2718.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 39.79 | 9.05 |
| Recency | 18 September 2019 | 10 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 8 |
| Threads | 128 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 7H12 has a 340% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Ryzen Embedded V2718, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1767% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded V2718 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
