Pentium 6805 vs EPYC 7H12

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.02
+1474%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Pentium 6805 by a whopping 1474% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Pentium 6805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking371570
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.17no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)no data
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years ago)1 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$1970 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Pentium 6805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1284
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Pentium 6805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCBGA1526
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Pentium 6805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Pentium 6805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Pentium 6805 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Pentium 6805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733
Maximum memory size4 TiB64 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7H12 and Pentium 6805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.02
+1474%
Pentium 6805 2.86

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Pentium 6805 by 1474% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+1474%
Pentium 6805 4424

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Pentium 6805 by 1474% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.02 2.86
Recency 18 September 2019 1 October 2020
Physical cores 64 2
Threads 128 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 15 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 6805 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium 6805 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Pentium 6805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Pentium 6805
Pentium 6805

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 185 votes

Rate Pentium 6805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Pentium 6805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.