Apple M2 Pro vs EPYC 7F32
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7F32 outperforms Apple M2 Pro by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7F32 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 432 | 462 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 14 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,100 | no data |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7F32 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 3.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7F32 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP3 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and Apple M2 Pro are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and Apple M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and Apple M2 Pro.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 7F32 outperforms Apple M2 Pro by 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 7F32 outperforms Apple M2 Pro by 8% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.16 | 14.60 |
| Recency | 14 April 2020 | 17 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7F32 and Apple M2 Pro.
Be aware that EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F32 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
