Xeon Platinum 8174 vs EPYC 7742

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking45not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency18.45no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)1 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,950no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads12848
Base clock speed2.25 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplier22.5no data
L1 cache4 MBno data
L2 cache32 MBno data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)33 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data65 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size4 TiB768 GB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2019 1 July 2017
Physical cores 64 24
Threads 128 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 240 Watt

EPYC 7742 has an age advantage of 2 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 6.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7742 and Xeon Platinum 8174, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742
Intel Xeon Platinum 8174
Xeon Platinum 8174

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 128 votes

Rate EPYC 7742 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8174 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7742 or Xeon Platinum 8174, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.