Atom x7835RE vs EPYC 7702P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7702P
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
41.99
+673%

EPYC 7702P outperforms Atom x7835RE by a whopping 673% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702P and Atom x7835RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking581148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.05no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,425no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702P and Atom x7835RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1288
Base clock speed2 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702P and Atom x7835RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702P and Atom x7835RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702P and Atom x7835RE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702P and Atom x7835RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 32EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702P and Atom x7835RE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702P 41.99
+673%
Atom x7835RE 5.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7702P 64943
+673%
Atom x7835RE 8400

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.99 5.43
Recency 7 August 2019 8 April 2024
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 12 Watt

EPYC 7702P has a 673.3% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Atom x7835RE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7702P is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7835RE in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7702P is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7835RE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702P and Atom x7835RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7702P
Intel Atom x7835RE
Atom x7835RE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 32 votes

Rate EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7835RE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702P or Atom x7835RE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.