A6-9220e vs EPYC 7702

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7702
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.18
+7071%

EPYC 7702 outperforms A6-9220e by 7071% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing EPYC 7702 and A6-9220e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking372639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation2.43no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)1 June 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450no data
Current price$8948 (1.4x MSRP)$308

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

EPYC 7702 and A6-9220e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1282
Base clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm28 nm
Die size192 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and A6-9220e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and A6-9220e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and A6-9220e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and A6-9220e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702 45.18
+7071%
A6-9220e 0.63

EPYC 7702 outperforms A6-9220e by 7071% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7702 69872
+7096%
A6-9220e 971

EPYC 7702 outperforms A6-9220e by 7096% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 45.18 0.63
Recency 7 August 2019 1 June 2017
Physical cores 64 2
Threads 128 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 6 Watt

The EPYC 7702 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220e in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7702 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9220e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702 and A6-9220e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702
AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 304 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702 or A6-9220e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.