Processor N95 vs EPYC 7662

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
45.51
+1331%
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.18

EPYC 7662 outperforms Processor N95 by a whopping 1331% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking431616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency19.1520.08
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads1284
Base clock speed2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache256 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket SP3Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7662 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Processor N95.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.51 3.18
Recency 19 February 2020 3 January 2023
Physical cores 64 4
Threads 128 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7662 has a 1331.1% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Processor N95, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N95 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N95 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 717 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.