AMD EPYC 7713 vs EPYC 7662

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

EPYC 7662
47.74

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7662 by 14% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data1.79
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years old)15 March 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,060
Current priceno data$12019 (1.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads128128
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.68 GHz
L1 cache4 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketSocket SP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 47.74
EPYC 7713 54.41
+14%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7662 by 14% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7662 73321
EPYC 7713 83566
+14%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7662 by 14% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 47.74 54.41
Recency 19 February 2020 15 March 2021

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7662 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 8 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 102 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.