AMD EPYC 7713 vs EPYC 7502P

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

EPYC 7502P
32.75

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7502P by 66% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7502P and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money39.381.79
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years old)15 March 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,300$7,060
Current price$739 (0.3x MSRP)$12019 (1.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7502P has 2100% better value for money than EPYC 7713.

Technical specs

EPYC 7502P and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads64128
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.68 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm+
Die size192 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7502P and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7502P and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7502P and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7502P and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7502P and EPYC 7713.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7502P 32.75
EPYC 7713 54.41
+66.1%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7502P by 66% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7502P 50298
EPYC 7713 83566
+66.1%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7502P by 66% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7502P 1118
EPYC 7713 1503
+34.4%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7502P by 34% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7502P 9884
EPYC 7713 14134
+43%

EPYC 7713 outperforms EPYC 7502P by 43% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 32.75 54.41
Recency 7 August 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 32 64
Threads 64 128
Cost $2300 $7060
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 225 Watt

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7502P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7502P and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7502P
EPYC 7502P
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 26 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7502P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 102 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7502P or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.