Core i7-11700F vs EPYC 7662

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
46.97
+245%

EPYC 7662 outperforms i7-11700F by a whopping 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Core i7-11700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking35512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data35.63
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Current priceno data$275

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and Core i7-11700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads12816
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache4 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache32 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Core i7-11700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket SP3FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Core i7-11700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

EPYC 7662 and Core i7-11700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Core i7-11700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Core i7-11700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Core i7-11700F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 46.97
+245%
i7-11700F 13.60

EPYC 7662 outperforms Core i7-11700F by 245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7662 72653
+245%
i7-11700F 21040

EPYC 7662 outperforms Core i7-11700F by 245% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.97 13.60
Recency 19 February 2020 16 March 2021
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-11700F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-11700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Core i7-11700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
Intel Core i7-11700F
Core i7-11700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 919 votes

Rate Core i7-11700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Core i7-11700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.