Core i7-11700KF vs EPYC 7643

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7643
2021
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
49.17
+217%

EPYC 7643 outperforms i7-11700KF by a whopping 217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7643 and Core i7-11700KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking31418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.0148.16
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,995no data
Current price$1330 (0.3x MSRP)$241

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-11700KF has 23% better value for money than EPYC 7643.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7643 and Core i7-11700KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads9616
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+14 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7643 and Core i7-11700KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7643 and Core i7-11700KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

EPYC 7643 and Core i7-11700KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7643 and Core i7-11700KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7643 and Core i7-11700KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7643 and Core i7-11700KF.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7643 49.17
+217%
i7-11700KF 15.51

EPYC 7643 outperforms Core i7-11700KF by 217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7643 76050
+217%
i7-11700KF 23989

EPYC 7643 outperforms Core i7-11700KF by 217% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.17 15.51
Physical cores 48 8
Threads 96 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 125 Watt

The EPYC 7643 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-11700KF in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7643 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-11700KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7643 and Core i7-11700KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7643
EPYC 7643
Intel Core i7-11700KF
Core i7-11700KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 232 votes

Rate EPYC 7643 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 500 votes

Rate Core i7-11700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7643 or Core i7-11700KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.