Ultra 5 125H vs EPYC 7642

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7642
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
38.42
+164%
Core Ultra 5 125H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.56

EPYC 7642 outperforms Core Ultra 5 125H by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking90518
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.23no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency15.5747.42
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,775$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads9618
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache3 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiB96 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7642 38.42
+164%
Ultra 5 125H 14.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7642 58795
+164%
Ultra 5 125H 22278

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.42 14.56
Recency 7 August 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 48 14
Threads 96 18
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 28 Watt

EPYC 7642 has a 163.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 242.9% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

Ultra 5 125H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 703.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7642 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 125H in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7642 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 125H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7642 and Core Ultra 5 125H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 331 vote

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7642 or Core Ultra 5 125H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.