Ryzen 9 5900HS vs EPYC 7601

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 5900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	218	489
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.35	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	AMD EPYC	AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codename	Naples (2017−2018)	Cezanne-HS (Zen 3)
Release date	29 June 2017 (7 years ago)	7 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,200	no data
Current price	$200 (0x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 5900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	64	16
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	3 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.2 GHz	4.6 GHz
L1 cache	96K (per core)	512 KB
L2 cache	512K (per core)	4 MB
L3 cache	64 MB (shared)	16 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Die size	192 mm2	no data
Number of transistors	4,800 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 5900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	no data
Socket	TR4	FP6
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 5900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 5900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 5900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	DDR4
Maximum memory size	2 TiB	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	170.671 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 5900HS.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	128	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7601 outperforms Ryzen 9 5900HS by 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	22.03	14.03
Recency	29 June 2017	7 January 2021
Physical cores	32	8
Threads	64	16
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7601 and Ryzen 9 5900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---