Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS vs EPYC 7573X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.89
+206%
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.67

EPYC 7573X outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS by a whopping 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking38458
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.45no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Architecture codenameMilan-X (2022)Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+)
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)19 April 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$5250 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache768 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FP7
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7573X 44.89
+206%
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 14.67

EPYC 7573X outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS by 206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7573X 69432
+206%
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS 22697

EPYC 7573X outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS by 206% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.89 14.67
Physical cores 32 8
Threads 64 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 35 Watt

The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7573X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7573X or Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.